"Bridgerton," Shonda Rhimes' highly-anticipated Netflix debut, promised a scandalous, soapy romp through Regency-era London. And while the show has undoubtedly captivated audiences with its lavish costumes, steamy romances, and addictive drama, it has also sparked a heated debate about its portrayal of race, historical accuracy, and the limits of escapist fantasy.
There's no denying that "Bridgerton" offers a welcome dose of escapism, whisking viewers away to a world of opulent balls, forbidden romances, and the intricate rules of high society. But the show's attempt to create a "colorblind" version of Regency England, where Black characters occupy positions of power and race is seemingly irrelevant, has left many viewers feeling uneasy.
“You can’t just sprinkle in Black royalty and call it a day,” one critic pointed out on Twitter.
“The show glosses over the brutal realities of colonialism and slavery, creating a sanitized version of history that feels disingenuous at best.”
The show's creators have defended their choices, arguing that "Bridgerton" is a work of fiction, not a historical documentary.
“We’re not trying to rewrite history,” Shonda Rhimes shared in an interview. “We’re creating a fantasy world where love and opportunity are not limited by race or social standing.
”
But critics argue that even in a fantastical setting, ignoring the historical context of race feels irresponsible and potentially harmful.
“By presenting a version of history where racism is magically solved by a royal marriage, the show risks minimizing the very real and ongoing struggles faced by people of color," one historian pointed out.
While the show’s handling of race has sparked the most controversy, "Bridgerton" has also been called out for its awkward sex scenes, its frustrating tendency to hint at queer storylines without fully committing to them, and its somewhat reductive portrayal of female characters.
“Daphne’s entire storyline revolved around getting pregnant,” one viewer lamented. “It felt regressive and out of touch, even for a period piece.”
Others expressed disappointment with the show's handling of Benedict Bridgerton's potential queerness, which was hinted at in early episodes but quickly dropped.
“Queer representation shouldn’t be a game of bait and switch,” one fan commented. “Either commit to the storyline or don’t introduce it at all.”
Despite its flaws, “Bridgerton” has sparked a much-needed conversation about representation in period dramas.
The show's diverse casting and its attempt to reimagine a more inclusive past, however imperfect, is a step in the right direction.
"I appreciate what 'Bridgerton' is trying to do," one viewer shared. "It’s not perfect, but it’s a start. Hopefully, it will pave the way for more nuanced and thoughtful representations of history on screen."
Whether you love it, hate it, or fall somewhere in between, there’s no denying that “Bridgerton” has struck a chord with audiences.
The show’s popularity suggests a hunger for diverse stories, even within the often-formulaic world of period dramas. And while "Bridgerton" may not have all the answers, it has, at the very least, asked some important questions about how we view history, representation, and the power of storytelling.
The article is not finished. Click on the next page to continue.
Next page
